The kit 24-70mm will cover 90% of video needs beautifully. But, considering what it does offer for the price tag, this is going to be our new most highly recommended entry-level full-frame camera body. Reasons to prefer the Nikon Z6 II: More detail: Has more megapixels (24.3 vs 20.7MP), which boosts linear resolution by 9%. Image Quality. Real world education & resources from the most successful wedding photography studios in the world. Honestly? Daylight is easy for most cameras these days to lock focus and track subjects, though. Nikon D610 vs Z5. Make no mistake; it’s not perfect, but that’s the fault of the adapter and third-party lens, not Nikon. However, there are some small differences between these two cameras worth pointing out. Both the Nikon Z50 and the Z6 use the same Z … Looking for a Nikon D750 vs Nikon Z5 comparison? First, let’s take a look at the front of the two cameras: As you can see, both cameras look very similar, with very slight differences on the top (due to the moved PASM dial), and a smooth finish on the right side of the mount on the Z5. Nikon Z5 has external dimensions of 134 x 101 x 70 mm (5.28 x 3.98 x 2.76″) and weighs 675 g (1.49 lb / 23.81 oz) (including batteries). In all fairness, no one has introduced a new camera line and put out more new lens than Nikon has in the first 2 years of Z. Canon did’nt and Sony didn’t even come close. The Z5 with the 24-200mm lens costs $2200, which is a bit much for an introductory level camera. Better image quality: Is equipped with a larger and more technologically advanced sensor. I think the differences will be more “pronounced” when Z6s will be on sale, the latter being rumored to introduce also the battery grip. Okay, now that we’ve gone in-depth about the two most important things about a camera, (for many, though not everybody) …let’s talk about the overall performance and specs of the Nikon Z5 versus the Z6. The Canon has a resolution of 44.8 megapixels, whereas the Nikon provides 24.2 MP. Looking for a Nikon Z7 vs Nikon Z6 comparison? We just got our hands on the Nikon Z5, and one of the very first things we did was compare it against its nearest sibling, the slightly older Nikon Z6. (It’s missing the front command dial, the C1, C2, and C3 buttons, a focus point control joystick, and a deep, comfortable grip.) Nikon knows will be delivering Z6s and that other brands have “entry” models; they needed to deliver a “cost accessible” model to avoid Z6s being the entry. If Nikon has trouble selling the Z5, I think the sticking point is not going to be the camera itself but the kit lenses. By checking this box I consent to the use of my information, as detailed in the Privacy Policy. In other words, you won’t be disappointed by the Z5’s autofocus unless you’re really pushing the envelope of what is possible in terms of low-light AF. The D750 has an internal flash and a top deck display. In any case, Z5 seems to be a good choice for “budget” Full Frame. The real competition, surely, is from the F-mount used market. The Z6 II can shoot at 14fps vs 12fps on the Z6 when using the Hi+ mode. Although the Nikon Z5 is aimed to be a lower-tier camera than the Z6, its image sensor, ergonomics, and the menu system are very similar to those of its bigger brother. Alright, here’s what everybody has been concerned about: when the Z5 was announced, sharp-eyed photographers noticed that the 24-megapixel sensor was not “BSI”, that is, it’s not Back-Side Illuminated. Better moiré control: Has an anti-alias filter to avoid artificial patterns to appear in images. By comparison, Canon’s EOS RP was just $100 cheaper than the Z5, at an MSRP of ~$1,300 originally, but in order to achieve that price point, Canon decided to go with just one SD memory card slot, a low-capacity “compact camera” battery, and no in-body stabilization. The D610 is a DSLR, while the Z5 is a mirrorless interchangeable lens camera. For one, the Nikon Z7 offers nearly double the resolution of the Nikon Z6 (45.7 MP vs 24.5 MP). All of the sample images in this review were taken using the 24.5 megapixel Fine JPEG setting, which gives an average image size of around 12Mb. It’s the low-light autofocus reliability that we need to really scrutinize! While you need to press the center button to change the camera mode on the Z6 (which is great, because it prevents accidental changes to camera mode), it is now a simple dial on the Z5. You can find this info in…-2Njlk_Y2M at 20:20. The “battle” is now also against D780 and still available D750, even if different concept/cameras and, I’d say, target users. “Low light performance” usually refers to high ISO settings. Our test results will demonstrate this shortly. You can still upgrade to premium anytime. The XQD cards are rare and expensive. ), Want to see what a HUGE difference a “correct” exposure can make, at ISO 12800? The Nikon D610 and the Nikon Z5 are two digital cameras that were officially introduced, respectively, in October 2013 and July 2020. The autofocus is pretty good. The Z5 won’t kill the Z50, because it is substantially more expensive and requires full-frame lenses. If you want an ultralight and portable full-frame camera, the Sony A7C does at least offer IBIS, 10 FPS, and over-sampled 4K video, just like the Nikon Z6, which to some photo+video shooters will be very worth it. However, the similarities are due to the fact that the Z6 has been around almost two years, and the Z5 is brand new. Second, due to having lower resolution, it is also able to shoot faster continuously at 12 FPS vs 9 FPS. And, in our experience, ISO 12800 is is usually more than any normal photographer will ever need!). Both cameras offer a resolution of 24.2 megapixels. Why release Z50? The D810, D850 are compromised by their resolution. (Well, I metered off a white wall, which should be white, but I let the camera’s metering make it grey; it’s not the camera’s fault! Find out where the Z5 wins! And the Z7 sports the technically superior autofocus system (493 autofocus points vs the Z6’s 273 autofocus points). Both cameras are equipped with a full frame sensor. We will first start out with ergonomic and body differences side-by-side, then talk about features. Announced on 21 July, the Z5 slots in below the Z6 as Nikon’s new entry-level full-frame mirrorless camera and features a slightly different 24.3-megapixel CMOS image sensor from the Z6 but the same EXPEED 6 image processor as other Nikon Z-mount cameras. Add a credit card now and it will be charged for an Annual Premium Membership ($499) at the end of your trial. Oh, and Canon also made the same compromise that Nikon made in terms of 4K video- the EOS RP crops to about ~1.6x and only records up to 4K 25p. You could get a used Nikon D750, and get roughly the same image quality if that’s all that matters to you, plus of course the dual SD card slots, hand-me-down flagship autofocus, and great battery life that made the D750 legendary. In order to compare 24 MP versus 45 MP side by side, I downsampled the Z7 images to match the Z6’s 4024 × 6048 resolution. Find out where the Z50 wins! Click through to find out about their relative size and key specifications. The Nikon Z5 might just be the most exciting entry-level full-frame mirrorless camera ever, considering that it costs just about $1,400 and yet competes with other cameras costing ~$2,000 or more! For me, after using the D700, Df and D810, it was not easy to get used on it, especially the touch screen. With that said, let’s get down to the nitty-gritty test results: The Nikon Z5’s autofocus is good enough to consistently nail focus the majority of the time, (say, anywhere from 7/10 to 9/10 of photos) at low light levels of an exposure value of 1/80 sec, f/1.8, and ISO 6400. Canon R5 vs Nikon Z5. But, if Z6 price goes down further, Z5 will get effected. With my Z7, the shadows are dark to black, period. It makes a bit of noise, but that’s easily solved by having an off camera mic. What I like is the video which is easier to handle as the D810. For now, that’s all we can conclude about the Z5. Also designed for photographers on a budget, the full-frame (FX-format) Z5 not only offers higher resolution than the 20.9MP Z50 and a larger image sensor but incorporates an array of the sophisticated features found in Nikon's higher-end Z6 and Z7 cameras. But Nikon has been busy, and within a week the new full-frame 24.3MP Nikon Z5 arrived on my doorstep to test out. The Low-Light Sensitivity comparison is wrong, assuming it’s referring to AF sensitivity. Aside from those two drawbacks, working with the Z5 is pretty fun; it feels exactly like a Z6 but with the mode dial re-arranged, and dual card slots of course. I shoot video with F lenses just fine. Follow his personal wilderness adventures: Login to access your dashboard, watch tutorials, submit photos for critiques and and get recognized for awards. Why make Z5 with such close similarities to Z6? It has a much faster continuous shooting rate of 12 FPS vs only 4.5 FPS on the Z5, which makes the Z6 a more desirable camera for photographing action. If there is a difference, it will be buried behind the much more significant difference of, whether or not you understand the correct focusing technique: which focus mode to use, which type of focus points to select, and how to control them around the viewfinder…, By comparison, when we reach for the Sony a9 II, the improvement in low-light conditions only allowed for about 1 EV darker shooting, (so 1/80 sec, f/1.8, and ISO 12800, and a slight improvement of maybe, say, 8/10 to 9/10 in-focus shots. If anything the on-sensor phase detection makes the D750 files look cleaner to my eye. First, the Z5 has quite a bit of image blackout when taking a picture, so if you want to “spray and pray” at the relatively modest 4.5 FPS, (the Z6 has 12 FPS, by comparison) …you’ll struggle to track very fast subjects in the viewfinder or on the rear LCD. Nikon is sort of confused. The LCD on the Z6 has more resolution, but most people are probably not going to care about that. Similar resolution, same processor, same EVF, same autofocus system, and very similar ergonomics. There is only 3 months difference between Z6 Mark II and Z5 so we are expecting this to be a fair comparison regarding age and technology level. This is how the Sony Real-Time Tracking system works, by the way, and Nikon’s Focus Tracking works almost as good in decent light, though it gets a bit less reliable in “terrible” light. Specifically, we compared the two most important things: image quality, and autofocus performance. Bravo, Nikon! Hello Nasim, thank you for your article, I was confused about the concrete differences between Z5 and Z6, really clarified me. [Related Reading: Nikon Z6 Review – Does Sony Have Serious Competition?]. If you want 14-bit RAW, or use another AF area setting on the mark II model, the speed decreases to 9fps (Z6) or 12fps (Z6 II) respectively. A z5 body might be a few hundred dollars cheaper than the z6 but you still have to buy the lenses so your overall costs aren’t much lower. By the way, the only advantage the Sony A7C might have over the Nikon Z6, really, is likely to be the high-speed action and/or low-light autofocus capability. …then you’ll probably love the Nikon Z5, too. That’s almost a macro lens. [Related Reading: Nikon Z50 Review | Getting Mirrorless Right The First Time?]. Honestly, though? You had to hit the OK button again to stop focus tracking. The Z6 has a top deck display and more dots on screen. Below you can see the Z50 and Z6 sensor size comparison. It has a sensor that delivers image quality similar to the Nikon D750 and Z6, but that’s not at all a bad thing since even the D750 sensor was already a benchmark for full-frame image quality, for five years from its release 7 years ago. If you are more heavily into video or any fast-action photography, the Sony will probably seem like a better value than either Nikon. There are a few quirks to Nikon’s ergonomics which are essentially identical to the Z6 and Z7, and you can read about some of those obscure complaints in our Nikon Z7 review, for example.